The enforcement of forced marriage protection orders

Ruth Gaffney-Rhys

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


    This article considers the enforcement of forced marriage protection orders, in the light of the decision of the High Court in Bedfordshire Police Constabulary v RU & Anor [2013] EWHC 2350 (Fam). In this particular case a young girl had successfully applied for a forced marriage protection order, which, inter alia, forbad her mother from organising a wedding. Despite this, the girl’s mother and aunt arranged a marriage and as a result, the police applied for committal for contempt of court. Because they had not made the initial application, the High Court declared that the police were not able to apply for committal. This constitutes a flaw in the scheme of forced marriage protection, for a young, vulnerable person who has obtained a forced marriage protection order may be unwilling to initiate proceedings to enforce it, due to parental pressure or fear that his or her relatives will be imprisoned. The Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill 2013-14 contains provisions that will remedy this particular defect, but it also proposes to criminalise forcing someone to marry, which may deter victims or potential victims from utilising civil remedies in the first place.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)25-29
    Number of pages5
    JournalInternational Family Law
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014


    • forced marriage
    • Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007
    • FMPO
    • Forced Marriage Protection Orders


    Dive into the research topics of 'The enforcement of forced marriage protection orders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this